Showing posts with label typewriter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label typewriter. Show all posts

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Font that time forgot.

I haven't seen this used for years. In fact, I don't think I've seen it outside of on-line volumes of freaky fonts since I last used it in 1972. I had a job for the summer at the New Life Centre in Bromley, Kent.

They had a sheet of rub-down letters (Like Letraset) in this font. I used it for a couple of jobs until we ran out of letters. The font was from Meccanorma, it's called Poster, and has been re-released

For you younger people out there - before the advent digital type we had three kinds of type in the main:

1. Phototypesetting, where people had very expensive machines with the letters on spinning disks usually. Setting was very expensive, I recall paying £25-40 an A4 page in 1980. Our typesetters had Berthold equipment. The disk looked like this. If I recall correctly, we had 10 founts to choose from.

2. Rub down lettering, such as Letraset. Each year I would excitedly get the new Letraset catalogue when it was released. It was an acquired skill to be able to put down a line of type that was straight and correctly spaced. I got more than one job in the early days that way. It also taught me a lot about letter spacing and legibility.

3. The IBM typesetter, based on a posh, complex and very expensive typewriter. Here's a picture of one. This used a carbon ribbon to give you clean type and best of all you could produce centred and justified text with it. Typefaces were interchangeable by lifting out the 'Golfball' that had the letters on it.

Here's a picture of one of the typefaces - although it should be noted this is just for the regular electric typewriter, it's a monospaced Elite.

All of the magazines and design jobs I worked on from leaving college until early DTP systems arrived used these - or a combination of these to produce print for reproduction by off-set litho.

Along with this, the artwork need to be generated by cutting and sticking to produce clean artwork. I was a very early adopter of DTP systems. When I started to freelance people wouldn't accept computer generated artwork, so I reverse engineered it to look like it had been done by hand.

Now days all of this is history. Producing 'real' artwork long gone. Even from today's stand point doing "mechanicals"; hand done stuck together artwork, is a short blip between 800 years of letterpress and the rise of computer based systems. I guess for professional artwork it was only around from 1968 - 1989 really.

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

Experimenting with type.

 This is the finished product. If you're quick they will be around the streets of Bath over the next few days. It's a flyer for Bedlam Fair, which is a celebration of street theatre.
I wanted a slightly home=brewed retro look to the product. Initially I was going to propose using Letterpress or Risograph printing rather than offset/digital, but in the end this didn't happen because everything began running late. I did start to to a Linocut version of a map of Bath but this this was abandoned because it's almost impossible to update. (Although actually drawing the route on each of the flyers did also occur.
In the end I used a Photoshop Plug-in to give some of the images - notably the map and the Bedlam Fair masthead a retro look. This plug in replicates the look of cheap printing and provides a large number of controls to make the fakery look realistic. Of course, for the proper effect I would have had to use it on the whole publication, which was probably going to be unacceptable, so I didn't.

 This is a shot of the inside. here you can see the final layouts and colours.

Choosing Type
To achieve the look, whilst retaining the part of the brief that says "simple and easy to read" required some experimentation, testing and repeating the exercise and drilling down until a combination had been found. Of course, this is how I choose type - it's a long-winded process if I do it properly, but if it's for a series of similar products then if I get it right I can avoid having to re-do it every time a job comes along.

 For this job I basically need two or three typefaces: 
  • A display face for the main titles, and possibly another for subheadings.
  • A body type. I've already decided that I want a typewriter face for the body type - so the first job is to try a number. 
Must have tried around 50 display faces - the picture here is just a sub-set. Of the ones I liked, three were protected, meaning they couldn't be embedded into a pdf, which makes them useless. Nights taker was far too compressed for the size I wanted anyway. Candy turned out to be trial. Nice fnt, but quite expensive for just a few lines and the 'free' version I have has a very incomplete glyph set.
The same was true for "Mother Typewriter" and I noticed looking at the paragraphs of body type that I had the same face with three different names.

Here you can se some of the typewriter faces. Traveling Typewriter soon becomes the front runner. Not too grungy, has pretty complete glyph set. My other favourite, 1942 Typewriter,   has incomplete glyphs and doesn't work well at smaller sizes.
So here's a sheet of trials mixing up body and display. The Dymo like font has gone in and out of favour. I'm warming to it because it gives a fairly solid bar of colours. Useful for separating out sections.

Sketch Rockwell/Block (Name depends on where you get it from. - see this post) is liked by nearly all testers; but eventually dropped as it doesn't play well when used small. It also takes up a lot of space.
 More test, this time beginning develop and use colours. I've invented four, later six colours.

They are called:

  • Mucky Cyan: c90/m0/y20/k10
  • Mucky Magenta: c10/m90/y0/k10
  • Mucky Yellow: c20/m10/y75/k0
  • Flat Black: c20/m20/y10/k80


Later I added:

  • Dirty Red: c0/m90/y90/k10
  • Grubby Green: c50/m0/y75/10
These colours are desinged to simulate a poorly maintained press colours with loads of cross-conyamination. Additionally, as you can see from the front cover, I also simulated mis-registration. (bet this is going to make a printer look twice).
As you can see from the sheet here, at the end of this iteration one body style and one headline style were eliminated.

 This is the black version to check legibility
Here  you can see mucky Cyan working with a distressed display font. I quite like this, as do the testers, except for the spacing between the lowercase n and t. This face however is soon eliminated as it turns out we only have lower case and that is incomplete. Should have checked earlier!
One particular concern is how these work at smaller sizes. This test leads onto a later test, but already the writing is on the wall for some fonts.
Really like the effect of the Dymo lettering font in colour. Think it works well. But it's eliminated as too many heading will have to go onto two lines, or it will be too small to be read easily.
 Final two sheets of experiments. Been about three hours now - maybe longer if you count lunch and passing them around the table.
we have too winners; Veneer and Traveling Typewriter, The fancy type face that is the runner up will be saved for some heading (it was dropped in the end) the green became blue/cyan because that worked better.
If you enlarge this page you can see my notes as they were being passed around about the various typefaces.

Incidentally, I think it's pretty important, if this is going to be print, that these are printed out and looked at on paper. Most ink jet printers now give you a good idea of what's going on.

And finally, here's a rough of the layout, printed out and marked up for Saturday/Sunday.

Type forms.

Have been working on a different publication, quite a small one - but it needed careful selection of type. One font that appealed initial was Sketch Rockwell, but this didn't scale to smaller sizes well. Out of interest I called it up, along with the two typefaces I did use. I was amazed at the detail in Sketch Rockwell - here's just the "S"; but each letter showed a lot of fine attention, which I'm betting hardly anyone ever notices.
Rockwell. Click to zoom in. Available all over the place, with different names. Someone, somewhere, designed this and put quite a lot into it. Then loads of people ripped it off. This link takes you to a designer with some claim (see Sketch Block) but maybe to avoid copyright claims over the name as Monotype own the Rockwell name (http://www.fonts.com/font/monotype/rockwell). Who knows? I wish I did!  

Traveling (American spelling) Typewriter. Can be got from here. Appears to be free to use, http://www.urbanfonts.com/fonts/Traveling_Typewriter.htm